NGO
Another Way (Stichting Bakens Verzet), 1018 AM
Edition
08: 19 April, 2011.
Edition
10 : 21 November, 2011.
Edition
11 : 18 January, 2011.
01. E-course : Diploma in
Integrated Development (Dip. Int. Dev)
SECTION A : DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS.
Study value :
04 points out of 18.
Indicative
study time: 112 hours out of 504.
Study points
are awarded only after the consolidated exam for Section A : Development
Problems has been passed.
First block : Poverty and quality of life.
Study value :
02 points out of 18.
Indicative
study time: 57 hours out of 504.
Study points
are awarded only after the consolidated exam for Section A : Development
Problems has been passed.
First block : Poverty and quality of life.
First Block : Section 1.
Analysis of the causes of poverty. [26.50 hours]
First Block : Section 2. Services needed for a good quality of
life.
First Block : Exam. [ 4 hours each attempt]
Block 1 of Section
1. Analysis of the causes of poverty. [26.50 hours]
Part 2 : In depth
analysis of the causes of poverty. [14.00
hours]
01. In depth : definition
of poverty.
02. In depth : some
factors linked with poverty.
03. In depth : debts and
subsidies.
04. In depth : financial
leakages : food and water industries.
05. In depth : financial
leakage : energy.
06. In depth : financial
leakage : means of communication..
07. In depth : financial
leakage : health and education.
08. In depth : financial
leakage : theft of resources.
09. In depth : financial
leakage : corruption.
10. In depth : the
industry of poverty.
Report on Section 1 of
Block 1 : [06.00 Hours]
Part 2 : In depth
analysis of the causes of poverty. [14.00
hours]
08. In depth : Financial
leakage : theft of resources. (At least one hour)
“…. producers and consumers of oil , coal and natural gas use the sky
commons as an open sewer. Every day, industry disposes 90 million tons of waste
products into our shared atmosphere at no cost.” (Quilligan, J.B. , Interest Rates and Climate
change : Realigning our Incentives through the Power of the Commons,
Kosmos, Vol. X, Number 1, Fall/winter 2010, p. 25, Kosmos Associates, Lenox, 2010.)
“The engine of perpetual growth is creating excess production in some
places, poverty and migration in others, and energy insecurity and ecological
degradation everywhere- all of which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions” (Quilligan, above, p.28).
“The global commons are not being exploited merely because nature’s
services are underpriced in the market, but because they are being propertized,
commodified, subsidized and subjected to interest-bearing debt.” (Quilligan,
above, p.27).
As Quilligan puts it (p. 27),
this is “Robbing assets from the future
and selling them in the present”.
Look at the following slide :
08. Financial leakage: theft of resources.
1. Research.
Make a list of your country’s laws on the exploitation of finite natural resources.
2. Opinion.
How are the interests of the local populations protected in the
laws ?
«We hold the land on trust for future
generations »
3. Opinion.
What do you think about this concept?
Which consequences does it bring
with it ?
Finite natural resources.
Read the United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples passed during
the 61st session of the
United Nations Assembly, Resolution 61/295,
Some countries already had constitutional
provisions protecting the rights of local populations. For instance :
Articles 119-126 of the
constitution of Venezuela expressly protect the rights of indigenous
peoples in respect of natural resources.
Article 120 provides:
« Exploitation by the State of the natural
resources in indigenous habitats shall be carried out without harming the
cultural, social and economic integrity of such habitats, and likewise subject
to prior information and consultation with the indigenous communities
concerned. Profits from such exploitation by the indigenous peoples are subject
to the Constitution and the law.”
4. Opinion.
Article 120 excludes ’exploitation by private operators. Why ?
Do you agree with the view expressed in the slide that finite natural
resources are of national interest?
Do you agree with the view expressed in the slide that local populations
have a right to part of the revenues deriving from the sale of finite natural
resources ? If you think they do have such a right, to which part ?
Read Women raise their voices against tree plantations- The role of the
European Union in disempowering women in the South , Friends of the
Earth et al., March 2009.
“…the three studies show that the plantations being
promoted (rubber trees, wood for pulp and oil palms) were in no way designed to
meet the needs of the communities. On the contrary, they were designed on the
basis of an agro-export model geared to the countries of the North – and the
European Union specifically in the cases studied – in order to promote
excessive consumption, made possible thanks to a series of policies that
benefit big corporations.” (p.31)
5. Research.
At this time, which part of revenues from the sale of local finite
resources in your chosen area is invested locally?
How much money is involved ?
Which form doe the investments take ?
Theft of land
“… land grabbing is a serious threat to the food
sovereignty of our peoples and the right to food of our rural communities.” Stop land
grabbing now ! GRAIN.org,
“Today's farmland grabs are moving fast. Contracts are
getting signed, bulldozers are hitting the ground, land is being aggressively
fenced off and local people are getting kicked off their territories with
devastating consequences. While precise details are hard to come by, it is
clear that at least 50 million hectares of good agricultural land – enough to
feed 50 million families in
“RAI [Principles
for Responsible Agricultural Investment that Respect Rights, Livelihoods and
Resources} is out of step with the times. The whole approach to
so-called agricultural development that it embodies – a greenhouse gas pumping,
fossil fuel guzzling, biodiversity depleting, water privatising, soil eroding,
community impoverishing, genetically modified seed dependent production system
– belongs in the 20th century rubbish heap of destructive, unsustainable
development. Just as our Arab sisters and brothers have been breaking the
shackles of old regimes to recover their dignity and space for
self-determination, we need to break the shackles of the corporate agriculture
and food system. “It’s time to outlaw
landgrabbing, not to make it “responsible” , GRAIN,
For
a one-page review of the status of land
grabbing activities see : Land Grabs in Poor Countries Set to Increase by Hilaire Avril , Inter Press Service, Rome,
September 09, 2010.
Read the article by Vidal J. How food and water are driving
a 21st century African land
grab (The Observer,
Read : Odeny E. et al (eds), Landgrabbing in
Kenya and Mozambique, Food First Information and Action Network (FIAN),
Read the article by Olivier
de Schutter, the UN Special Reporter on
the right to food, Responsibly Destroying the World’s
Peasantry. (Project Syndicate , www.project-syndicate.org 2010).
Read the article Africa up for
grabs : the scale and impact of land grabbing for agrofuels, edited
by H.Burley and A.Bebb, Friends of the Earth,
“ There are over 2,500 bilateral investment treaties
(BITs), which protect investors from changes to host government policy and
which may be impairing the ability of countries to regulate investments
effectively. The opportunity for investors to
challenge public policy through arbitration procedures under these BITs weakens
developing countries’ capacity to regulate their food, land, and water sectors,
as well as to introduce policies that promote food security and poverty
reduction.” (Zagema B., Land and Power : The growing
scandal surrounding the new wave of investments in land, Oxfam
Briefing Paper 151, Oxfam, Oxford, 22 September, 2011, ISBN 978-1-84814-947-2,
p. 38.) This Oxfam document is a
well-referenced denunciation of land-grabbing practices.
Full details of land-grabbing in
Renewable natural resources.
6. Opinion.
Do you agree with the view expressed in the slide that renewable natural
resources belong to the local populations?
Do you agree with the view expressed in the slide that local populations
have the right to 100% of the income from the sale of renewable natural
resources from their area?
Read the
agreement reached between the European Union and Senegal on fishing rights off
the coast of Senegal. Fishing rights “purchased” by European
countries have led to the end of the traditional activities of fishing villages
on the Atlantic coast of
The case of fishing rights in
lake Victoria is another well-known example. “These
days, you sometimes go out there and come back empty-handed." (Charles
Kyaba, fisherman,
“It is no
exaggeration to characterize these forerunners [the East India Company
chartered in 1600 and the Dutch East India Company, chartered in 1602 – note
Bakens Verzet) ] of contemporary publicly traded limited liability corporations
as, in effect, legally sanctioned and protected crime syndicates with private
armies and navies backed by a mandate from their home governments to extort
tribute, expropriate land and other wealth, monopolize markets, trade slaves,
deal drugs, and profit from financial scams.” ( Korten D, On the Origin of Corporations, YES
! Magazine, March 07, 2011)
Which
part of revenues from renewable natural resources in your project area is at
the disposal of the local populations?
How much is
involved ?
How do you think local renewable natural
resources can be better exploited in the interests of the local populations?